Skip to content

Conversation

gfx54b
Copy link
Contributor

@gfx54b gfx54b commented Oct 17, 2025

No description provided.

@gfx54b gfx54b added the 2025.11 label Oct 17, 2025
@gfx54b gfx54b marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2025 11:23

== Status description
error: procedure exception - generic topology procedure error. An unexpected error has occurred. Please refer to the server's debug log for more information.
error: procedure exception - generic topology procedure error. An unexpected error has occurred: `{ <<msg>> }`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, @gfx54b. Can we also add examples for both? See 22N71, 22N69, 22NAB, 42I64, and many more for inspiration.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've added an example - are we good to go ahead? I don't want to merge the core DB PR, before this is ready to go.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks good, only the full stop is missing in the message. See below.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The full stop is tricky. Some of the msg will already contain a full stop, some not, so I am a bit reluctant to put it into the template.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Then, you can add it to the status description.

=== xref:errors/gql-errors/52N11.adoc[52N11]

Status description:: error: procedure exception - generic topology procedure error. An unexpected error has occurred. Please refer to the server's debug log for more information.
Status description:: error: procedure exception - generic topology procedure error. An unexpected error has occurred: `{ <<msg>> }`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file is autogenerated. You don't need to update it. I'll take care of it before I merge.

Copy link
Contributor

@Lojjs Lojjs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good apart from my comment on the example

Co-authored-by: Louise Berglund <louise.berglund@neo4j.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@Lojjs Lojjs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me now

@gfx54b gfx54b requested a review from renetapopova October 20, 2025 18:24
Copy link
Collaborator

@renetapopova renetapopova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can merge your PR into the code base. The only thing missing is the full stop at the end of the message. I am not sure if it should be part of the message or part of the status description.

I'll take care of this one after we publish 2025.10. Could you also add an example to 52N17?


== Status description
error: procedure exception - generic topology procedure error. An unexpected error has occurred. Please refer to the server's debug log for more information.
error: procedure exception - generic topology procedure error. An unexpected error has occurred: `{ <<msg>> }`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks good, only the full stop is missing in the message. See below.

@neo4j-docops-agent
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR includes documentation updates
View the updated docs at https://neo4j-docs-status-codes-393.surge.sh

Updated pages:

Copy link
Collaborator

@renetapopova renetapopova left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I'll add labels later and regenerate the index file.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants